Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Responsa for Bava Kamma 126:13

ולמאן דאמר חד בגנב וחד בטוען טענת גנב דלא מייתר למעוטי טענת אבד מנא ליה מגנב הגנב

and the words 'put his hand unto his neighbour's goods' occur in this section<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Ex. XXII, 7. ');"><sup>13</sup></span> which precedes the other one; just as there<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Ibid. 10. ');"><sup>20</sup></span>

Teshuvot Maharam

Q. (1) A made a contract with B and gave him a pledge as security that he would fulfill the contract and said, "If I do not carry out the terms of the contract the pledge shall be yours."
(2) C went surety for A to B promising to pay him a certain amount if A should break the terms of the contract.*That two questions were asked of R. Meir, one regarding security, and another regarding a surety, is seen from the fact that towards the end of this Responsum (in the Pr. 130 version which deals with a pledge) R. Meir uses the phrase וכ׳׳ש ערב לא משתעבד מק׳׳ו המשכון עצמו פטור כ׳׳ש הערב, which seems to indicate that the question was also about a surety. Furthermore, Responsum Cr. 34, gives exactly the same answer as Pr. 130, regarding a surety. Do such transactions fall under the rule of asmakta (אסמכתא)?
A. Both cases fall under the rule of asmakta and are, therefore, not binding.
SOURCES: Cr. 34, Pr. 130; L. 356; Asher, Responsa 108, 27.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Previous VerseFull ChapterNext Verse